Robotic Surgeries- Pros and Cons

Here are my views on robotic surgeries, based on my reading and observation of numerous articles about this topic. In the view below, I present the positives and negatives I found about robotic and surgeon-based surgeries. These are my own views; your views may vary. I will also cover some additional topics related to this in the coming articles.

 

Pros-

Robotic surgeries can provide solid grip, precision, and accuracy.

Are the results superior to general surgeries? Many reports claim it is comparable, while others say it is better, especially given its expertise in remote surgeries.

Robotic surgeries can help alleviate tremors in cases where some surgeons experience this condition.

Robotic surgeries can reach places where surgeons’ hands may struggle to reach.

They can help in remote surgeries where patients can’t reach the doctor.

These are automatic devices and hence come under automation.

In pandemic/epidemic-like situations, such systems can save many lives if operated effectively and with uninterrupted network availability.

They can be used to treat soldiers in combat locations.

They can be used in places like the International Space Station.

They can also be used in spaceships and on other planets in case entrepreneurs decide to venture to new extraterrestrial lands.

Many cases provide reports that say it causes less blood loss and quicker recovery. 

 

Cons-

 

Surgeons perform robotic surgeries through a surgeon console, which must be in sync with robotic arms mounted on the patient.

There are clauses that allow surgeries performed by robots to be converted to surgeon-based surgeries in the event of complications. This clause is added, which means that the chance of complications can’t be eliminated, and surgeons must be prepared for any emergencies.

It is a costly system, and not all institutions can buy it.

Blood loss and side effects are considered similar to those of surgeries performed by surgeons without the use of robots. 

Some models shareholders in 2013 said robots failed to report injuries.

Training surgeon and staff is another concern.

Extra costs for replacement parts. This, along with some other issues, was settled outside the courtrooms for some models.

Maintaining the machine and conducting a comprehensive test of its functionalities should be included in the annual servicing process.

Patient safety is foremost.

Network connection issues in in-place and remote surgeries are a real concern to be aware of especially for remote area surgeries.

Continuous power backup must also be noted.

Yes, they do help to reduce trembling and improve grip.

Surgeons can do many things that machines can’t, and there are tasks such as ultra-precision procedures for which robots can provide assistance.

 

These are some points. However, each patient can be recommended a robotic surgery or a human surgeon surgery based on personalized inputs. Here, AI can help determine which patient is suited to which type of surgery —robotic surgery or traditional surgery.