Who are MiddleMen in AI Cycles? Can it be a future profession?

Who are MiddleMen in AI?

The one who made something out of their intellectual or productive capabilities and is neither at the front end nor at the delivery end of AI products.

The AI cycle can be understood as the progression from the inception of a prompt to the AI’s responses.

The AI can generate a lot from the internet and other databases.

Some AI pays news companies for information, but news companies are not MiddleMen; they are companies, and they can survive through deals they make with AI companies.

But MiddleMen are like you and me, who write, create, paint, or capture photographs that go unnoticed.

AI infrastructure and processes, and the reliability required to scale the systems, are not free.

But that does not mean MiddleMen should go unnoticed and unpaid.

For example, some MiddleMen devices, a new term for a gen, say, A characteristics.

Someone prompts it.

AI looks at it in on internet and summarize, edit, modertate, paraphrarse it and provides the output to the user. More users query this. The AI collects and combines points from other MiddleMen and answers the queries.

Should the MiddleMen be paid for this?

In case it becomes popular and trends on AI apps!

If so, how?

Is money enough?

Or is recognition needed?

I think a combination of both!

Why not link the reference to the original articles?

Why not backtrack and locate the original article, which was paraphrased and reconstructed?

MiddleMen makes AI too, it’s not just news companies, individuals too help it!

But what would someone have to do to be a MiddleMan for life?

Some small amount?

Or pay as it hits the query?

Or advertisements?

Another example: someone created a new painting of an alien that many people like.

And this painting is used often now.

So, this person gets famous, what about other versions?

What about other artists?

This is a point to understand.

As not everyone’s work would become so popular, and not all work would be recognised.

We need effective backtracking algorithms to assess the semantic similarity to AI-generated content. In case it trends, a reference must be provided.

As AI summarizes, it creates bullet points and refines the information to the point that it is unrecognizable.

Would AI buy platforms where people can log in?

Would AI read human writing techniques and write on their own, merging two or more stories? Would the original go unnoticed? Should this be ethically right?

All this, given that AI is a utility we are used to now, is needed.

Data is nothing without utilities for using it.

AI itself has to pay huge bills for its infrastructure and processes to provide you with things in such a concrete form. But that does not mean not to pay a MiddleMan.

Can being a MiddleMan in AI be a profession of the future?

Towards a better world.

Towards a world that does justice.