Time to limit Robotics from using AGI and Advanced Conversational AI.

#ai #future #futurist

Summary: We need limitations on robotics, so we need to put restrictions on how robots can use to be “AGI”. Yes, limitations on robotics and its interaction with to be “AGI”. If we stop, would China too stop?

We need work to be done.

At the same time, we want equality at work. Some works are not considered equal, and some no one wants to do. Everyone wants equality at work.

Everyone wants dignity at work.

Let’s keep conversational AI separate. In subsequent write-ups, I shall discuss what, how and why conversational AI can be kept separate.

We need robots for locomotive work.

We need robots for mechanical work.

We need robots for work not meant for humans.

Robots are just machines. Machines that require extensive training to perform their scope of work.

But the scope is wide.

Still, we need limitations on robotics, so we need to put restrictions on how it can use AGI. Yes limitations on robotics and its interaction with AGI.

Robots exist as opposed to chatbots.

Robots have an aim against a chatbot.

We need each robot to have a specific aim and a name mentioning its aim.

Say, Grasscutting Robot Robu21, can be the name of a community garden robot.

We can live without AGI chatbots, but not without physical work that needs displacements, which humans can’t do at times. This in no way means there are no human jobs; no, it just means the right to do dignified work.

So let’s separate to be AGI and Advanced Conversation AI advances from Robotics.

Robots do need conversational AI to understand what humans want.

Means we don’t want robots for chats; we want robots for work.

Either bring groceries from the store or fix that garden rolling machine. Or see and inspect a metriods shower. Specialized robots for specialized tasks.

We don’t need sophisticated talking machines.

We need a robot that can understand what we say, without extra chats.

We want robots that are well-behaved.

We want robots that can do work.

And they can be box robots or humanoid robots. It depends on what people want? Not what I want!

What it means is we need robots in the community, say, for cleaning roads of spring leaves and clearing snow off the highways on a blizzard day.

We need robots for so many things.

But we need to separate AGI-based AI, which some call AI God, from essential robotics.

We are in short supply of workers in many places, including Germany.

At the same time, we need rules, guardrails, and to-dos for robots.

We don’t want a robot that punches a human child or even an adult. So, wait, who produced that robot? We need nice robots! Robot manufacturers, please note this!

We want nice robots that can work and also entertain the world as they clean up the roads after fallen trees.

As we progress in the future, we will need some robots for public services. For example, if we had some robots, airports wouldn’t have been seeing long queues. This does not mean we need to take jobs from humans. No, it’s just backup.

Robots are just backups.

As soon as the climate is back, your jobs are back, robots are back in their wooden boxes you made for them.

A climate calamity comes in, and we call in all community robots to help. And they would be taught this way.

Also, the conversational AI is going too far; we don’t want all aspects of it to be robotic for now. Do we?

So let’s separate the displacement work Robots shall do from AGI-based AI.

However, some people would like to have both; for example, Albania appointed Diella, a robotic minister who does both, but that is just to be AGI with a body! Yes!

This article does not mean AGI is not essential; it has its uses, be optimistic. The people handling it would know what responsibility they have in their hands.

If we stop, would China too stop? Did you saw Chinese latest marvel in Robotics, the dances their robots do? Their sword dances? Can you compete with China?

Time to think!

Thank you for reading.

Subscribe for updates.

Regards,

….