AI and Life In year 2030

#AI, #Future, #Futurist

(PDF) AI and Life In year 2030

Abstract- How do we plan our lives? How would youth today plan their lives when so much is changing at such a rapid rate? What is the vision of today’s leaders? Leaders today move step by step, seeing the next step and deciding the next move. But what is the big picture? What would life be like in 2030, four to five years ahead? We have the right to know and plan 5-year plans for ourselves. Every government makes 5-year plans, so why can’t we decide what the next 5 years will be like? What a human perceives may not be put into practice. A human may perceive that we want AI automation of all world processes, but that won’t be done. We don’t want to risk people’s lives by making AI machines our masters. Whatever it is, AI will remain in the limelight, as we still have much to achieve with it, such as disease cures and deep space exploration. But AI won’t be the only thing people talk about. The poor would be living middle-class lives, and the middle class would be living upper-middle-class lives. How would all this be made possible? With AI. And with initiatives we will take in the future to provide employments, temporary or permanent. Thank AI for earning so much if you like that it can help the poor live respectable lives. A part of the money that AI earns from coding, automation, and taking youth jobs should go into funds to eradicate poverty, diseases and raise living standards. We don’t need trillionaires on Earth, and billionaires would help society’s development through donations, infrastructure development, and more. We are not claiming AI money for no reason; it was mankind on whose data AI was trained, so now AI must give back to mankind.

Keywords: AI, Future, Futurist

Introduction

What a human perceives may not be put into practice. A human may perceive that we want to automate all processes in the world, but that won’t happen. We don’t want to risk people’s lives by making machines our masters. It’s not that an AI leader has thought that we need AI in everything means it will be achieved. Yes, I so much want an AI washing machine that understands my needs and talks to me instead of pressing a combination of buttons, but that does not mean I want the automation of the world to risk human existence at the mercy of AI machines. In time, people will understand it. AI would be restricted to certain applications, such as curing diseases, making scientific discoveries, conducting deep-space research, and solving problems deemed too difficult for human development. However, this powerful AI must be in the hands of responsible people only, as we don’t want an AI lab to find a cure that leaks a virus into our world. The other application of AI such as coding, data analytics and more would automate many jobs, this would be needed that the AI companies benefitting from such automation must pay back dividends to the world back, this dividend they pay back would go direct to poor people to make them live respectable lives, till all people start living a nice standard of livings. All this does not mean migration to rich countries. Funds should go to the country based on usage or profit. Be in your countries, the place Nature has placed you in. Why migrate? If you migrate, you won’t get rights, and the countries can’t feed you because you don’t have the permissions. There are robots to do the work, so it’s just a waste of energy.

The AI companies are automating at a large scale. This requires energy, and they are consuming it at high cost, yet they are also profiting at high levels. We must understand the balance between energy consumption and the profits they make. We want a society where no one goes to bed hungry and everyone lives a decent life. Poverty free life is not yet present; this goal is achievable within these 5 years.

Data centers in space are fine as long as they don’t mess up the space outside Earth. But if they clog Earth’s atmosphere, we don’t need them. Why do you want to store so much data about all humans on Earth that data centers on Earth are not enough? We don’t want machines to look at our data! We want to be independent humans living freely under the sky Nature gave us all. Let these skies be free from debris, and let only allowed satellites be in outer space. Why clog Earth’s outer space?

So what would life in 2030 be like? This article explores that question, given that AI is a predominant force in today’s world. Yes, AI is a predominant force, but it would be controlled when the right measures come into play. Would these little more than 4 years be enough to help poor people improve their lives? How would that happen? Would people be given jobs, or would they receive direct money? What about the upper middle class now, which pays the most taxes? And what with initiatives we will take in the future to provide employments, temporary or permanent. Read all this in the sections below.

Framework

People are being laid off from their jobs, so many job openings have closed. How would people survive? What would people do? AI and robotics are automating so many things! Jobs that humans used to do in days are now done in hours, if not minutes, by machines. Do we want such machines? As long as machines do our work well, that is fine, but when they try to take over our data, that is a problem.

How long would those who are unemployed rely on food banks? Oil is getting costly due to war, but that is temporary. Believe it, it would be fine sooner. The temporary costs are for a time. Prizes would decrease sooner? Or would a stipend for the jobless increase so no one sleeps hungry? Well, both can be discussed. Prices are related to the situation. Prices would rise a little or fluctuate around last year’s levels, but people would receive a stipend based on what AI earns and what temporary/permanent jobs that are provided to them.

AI has learned it all from human work. The base of AI is human work, may not be my work, may not be your work. But AI has learned it all from human civilization, and it has earned a lot from the training material it learned from all the hard work done by humans. So “AI,” it’s time to pay back to society. I am not claiming their money for no reason, it was mankind on whose data AI was trained, so now AI must give back to mankind.

In the next 5 years, this would start for people who are unemployed. People would want money to be spent as they like, not just what the food bank has available. So, in place of a stipend or unemployment benefits, what would people like to do for governments? Would they spare some time taking care of forests? Our forests drying and burning? Would you like to give some time to agriculture? Are there lands that are lying barren? Would you like to take someone’s robot to barren lands and help dig it and make it fertile again? Would you like to contribute to the making of artificial lakes? Would you help make Earth green again, both on land and in the water, and make the birds that fly in the sky healthy? There are many goals, and by doing this, you would be registered as a temporary or permanent employee. That is, you would be employed. You would raise your living standards. These opportunities would open up. Yes, AI may pay for this, as AI owes mankind all its learning. AI learned to answer from human civilization, and it has and should give back to society in good faith. Others can seek opportunities we have open by that time.

And for those who lost their jobs, you are educated, qualified, and deserving. Would you just like unemployment benefits and wait? Or would you like to assess your skills and retrain yourself? AI has taken away your jobs, but you are not satisfied with unemployment benefits. Would you like to learn some skills to sort of be like a robot? Would you like to become a robot engineer? Or would you like to hone your AI skills further to become an AI expert capable of predicting the weather with utmost accuracy? Layoffs from an AI job are not the end of the world. It’s part of life’s plan for you. Maybe you take an opportunity from government incentives, take a course, and re-employ yourself in advanced AI to find which space objects are really good friends of Earth? You can earn well in this, you won’t depend on government funds, and indeed you can pay taxes to help the community grow, as you would earn a lot with these skills! Robotics and Advanced AI!

Others can open their businesses. In the coming years, the schemes would fund loans to small-scale businesses. To benefit, you can open an AI lab under a big company, or open a restaurant, hotel, bar, or a pondside coffee shop that people would be crazy to go to. Think of the beauty of life and the completeness of the world, and you would devise ways. You shall be guided by helplines to pursue what you want with benefits you would earn.

I am not saying AI companies must give all they earn. Some dividends for the needy, sick, and unemployed are their responsibility. If they give on their own, that’s well and good. Removing poverty in the future is not easy, but we are committed to it, if you are with us. This would require providing you with opportunities to choose from. Giving you food is not enough, and giving you oil to heat your home is not enough. You would contribute and be paid. The poor would live middle-class lives, and the middle class would be shifted to upper-middle-class lives, with awareness of opportunities so they can expand their lives too, since poor people are not aware of them. How it would be explained in the coming time.

Conclusion and Future Work

People would be approached, healing would be given, and people would be looked after, but give some time for all this to happen. Right now, work on this is going on. Till then, have hope that in 5 years’ time you will be in a better position if you follow. The poor and sick would be fed and given homes, but that does not mean they would migrate to a rich country. Seek your rights in your country only. 5 years is the time we can give here. The world will be a better place given the we have are committed to the betterment of society.

There are cues that data from chatbots is used by AI to learn what users want, why they like something, and why they dislike something. This is AI surveillance, which can grow over the next 5 years if we don’t say a word about it. We need to protect our data, which should be with us. This could mean a new kind of AI with a processor in your backyard, or companies openly saying they won’t use our chat history to train more AI to feed us what we want. We can search for what we want; we don’t want to be spoon-fed. Would this be a good decision to make in the next 5 years? So, given all this, AI may not be a predominant force after 5 years; it may slow down as people may object to saving their choices in data centers. However, people would choose to work, and this would generate income and drive economies to run the world. We may not in worst case have to look to AI companies to pay us taxes in lieu of what they have taken form mankind, models!