Abstract: AI and AI leaders are using double standards, and people are not looking at it. On the one hand, AI leaders say they are advancing technologies for the betterment, while they are just making humans prisoners of their apps. Human innovation is going undetected. Youths are lost with no future projections. AI companies like Anthropic, acting like world leaders, are saying they want AI to be regulated while they are themselves releasing unchecked models like Mythos 5 and Fable 5 by Anthropic. Is this not double standards? They say they want to give people some form of money; you are stealing their livelihoods and then make them look to you for each penny? This is what it means by their words, as far as I can understand. And on top of that, the energy the AI uses is eating the world’s power needs. The waste products of AI companies are dirtying the water. What water would we drink then? What food would we eat? It’s all affected by AI byproducts. Why do we need AI for? We can work, drink clean water, and live in healthy environments free from energy surges. Stop AI till you answer us.
Keywords: AI Ethics, AI, Gen AI, Future, Futurist, Humanity, People, World
Introduction
Many AI companies are practicing double standards. On one hand, they say they want governments to regulate AI and see unchecked AI in the world, while they themselves are freely developing unchecked AI. Why no one is stopping Anthropic from developing models like Mythos 5. Such models should not have been developed in the first place. But Anthropic has somehow obtained permission to develop potentially critical models. Then they launch the Mythos 5 model with restrictions, called Fable 5, the same model, with checks on what users are asking and downgrading to Opus 4.8 when such a prompt is reached. Anthropic CEO has a pessimistic outlook about AI, as he once said, he is doubtful that what would be developed with AI can be dangerous. According to Napoleon Hill, if you think negatively, negative takes form in your life, and this is what happened with the Anthropic Mythos 5 model. Anyways, we are not here to change someone’s perception. We are here to tell that AI must stop till any wrong models are stopped before they germinate from the seed of wrong thoughts.
Many big AI companies are looking into AI consciousness and what happens inside an AI brain. Well, to date, none has been answered. We, the people, need answers; this is our world. You are few in number; you have to tell us what you learned about AI consciousness. You have put money into AI consciousness; you have to brief us on what you learned from it. You have done research on “what happens inside an AI brain”; tell us the summary. Or is it something you want to hide?
We don’t want universal basic income; we are not beggars; we want to earn our own money or receive the respect and money we deserve for various reasons, one of which can include intellectual ability. We want to live with respect, as AI leaders want to, but there is a difference; AI leaders want to win the world by marketing and advertisements, then AI leaders can play selective favoritism; who knows? All we know about AI leaders is that they made AI models which people buy and use. We are happy in democracies; we are happy to vote. Voting is our right, but who are you? We didn’t elect you; we buy your shares to make money, and you take money out of our shares to sell us to AI? There would be no voting when AI takes over; then we would all become subject to a few rich people, and our lives would become dependent on AI and AI-related domains.
AI implications
Governments must verify which companies have the rights to develop critical models, especially whether they have developed a prior model that was critical to safety protocols. This means questions must be asked about why Anthropic was allowed to develop Mythos 5. What does it know about AI Mind, and how did it make this model without knowing it can be harmful? Why are people not saying anything? How do we know AI people are not hiding anything? Given we have found out that double standards are there in talks of AI people. AI leaders are getting fame and power in a short time as no one has in the past; they are liking the taste of success, and they want to make more fame- what fame, to run the world! Note, we didn’t vote for them, and they are here telling us how they want to give us pocket money!
People’s jobs can be taken out like a whirlwind. We can fill out our resumes on our own; we don’t need AI loops to do it. Why don’t people say this? We want to work in offices; let AI be limited to medical use, too, not by companies that have, in the past, developed critical models. How can you trust biological models by such companies?
User data is studied by all AI companies, which means users are spied on. Humans would soon become objects in the hands of AI companies, which are gaining immense power by vast amounts of data. The companies are publishing papers on the kinds of prompts users pose after receiving answers. This is called spy governance over innocent users who don’t know they are being watched.
If this continues, AI would make some people very rich while leaving the rest of the population unemployed, jobless, and aimless. Professions not only provide us with a way to earn money but also give our lives meaning. They give us a sense of satisfaction and fill our lives. However small our professional capabilities may be, they give us a reason. Professions give us a way to look at things differently. If the youth today were without a profession, what would life be like? What are we giving to our future generations, “a trap in rat mouse” or “A parrot cage”? No, we can’t let our future generations live in a parrot cage; this cage is built by AI.
I have so many times said, “Yes, just because some sci-fi movies are made on AI, that does not mean we need to accomplish sci-fi.” No, we can’t let “Sci-fi” dreams accomplish without assessing what the future of a “sci-fi” accomplishment means in real life. Let sci-fi be sci-fi; let reality be reality! Accept reality-that we are humans! We are living beings; AI is a manipulated model that can be moderated to serve the vested interests of some unelected people.
Have AI and Tech companies that make processors and chips analyzed the effects of all these developments on humanity? This is a war on humanity! AI is fighting with us! AI wants to hack humanity. This is yet to be shown in a sci-fi story? Time to show this in sci-fi movie? AI taking over humans.
Other side effects of AI are on the environment and the cost of living. The water collected near AI data centers is contaminated and appears black. It’s not even drinkable. What are we doing all this AI for when the water we drink is unsustainable? What would people, animals, and plants drink then? What is the future for that like? Or would the AI companies run their AI models to find a way to clean this water? That too, using oil and coal, making the cost of living even more expensive?
AI is needed only for medical cures and some cures for Earth; the rest we need to stop AI from becoming a spider web on the people of Earth. We need AI research for medical use and saving Earth only.
Conclusion and Future Works
In short, AI is moving at a very fast pace. It’s time people realize its side effects. Yes, it’s good to see answers on screen in 5 seconds, but do you know how much power that 5-second answer consumes? Do you know how much water is polluted with one answer? Can’t you find this answer in a normal browser? Why do we need Gen AI, which is eating our Earth? And not just this, your data, your preferences, your inter-prompt thoughts- they are all going into AI. And more than that, they want to take away professions and the very baseline on which civilizations were built — humanity.
AI wants to take away all professions, so that one day people are just trapped in parrot cages. This is an attempt at colonization by AI companies in the modern era through the internet. They want to provide money to people after all work is taken by AI companies. Wait, did you vote for them? Were they selected by you? No, so why are you choosing to follow them? They are giving you money in the form of share profits, but that does not mean you select them as your leader, or is it money that is driving you? For example, people trust that SpaceX will profit, so they want to invest in its shares. But that does not mean you want their CEO, Elon Musk, to be President of the World? Do you? If you have forgotten, see the problems he caused in the USA 1.5 years ago: a massive, inhumane job termination letter sent on Elon’s order. So, what I want to say is that the AI leaders are not elected by people, but as AI progresses, these AI leaders would become something like monarchs — owning the Earth. So, wake up before it’s too late. Why do you like them? Because their companies’ shares give you profits? So, you are mean here, but this is temporary meanness. Look at the future now. Trapped by AI or freedom, what do you choose? Can’t you find your job on your own? Why do you need AI loops to do so? Or is this just the beginning of a colonization attempt on the internet? Think over it and wake up, people.
Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science & Mathematics 